Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs South Sudan: Global: Ease of doing business score
Global: Ease of doing business score over time
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- South Sudan
How they compare
Congo, Democratic Republic of the currently reports 36.21 DB17-20 methodology against 34.62 DB17-20 methodology in South Sudan, a difference of 1.59 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Congo, Democratic Republic of the has been ahead every year.
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 184th and South Sudan ranks 186th of 191 countries.
Congo, Democratic Republic of the has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global: ease of doing business score, Congo, Democratic Republic of the or South Sudan?
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the, at 36.21 DB17-20 methodology against 34.62 DB17-20 methodology in South Sudan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in global: ease of doing business score between Congo, Democratic Republic of the and South Sudan?
- 1.59 DB17-20 methodology, with Congo, Democratic Republic of the ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Democratic Republic of the and South Sudan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Congo, Democratic Republic of the and South Sudan rank globally for global: ease of doing business score?
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 184th and South Sudan ranks 186th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Global: Ease of doing business score (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ease of doing business score is the simple average of the scores for each of the Doing Business topics: starting a business, dealing with construction permits, getting electricity, registering property, getting credit, protecting minority investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies for topics that underwent methodology updates.