Mozambique vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Global: Ease of doing business score
Global: Ease of doing business score over time
- Mozambique
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 55 DB17-20 methodology against 54.46 DB17-20 methodology in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.54 DB17-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Mozambique ahead.
Mozambique ranks 139th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 142nd of 191 countries.
Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global: ease of doing business score, Mozambique or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Mozambique, at 55 DB17-20 methodology against 54.46 DB17-20 methodology in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in global: ease of doing business score between Mozambique and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 0.54 DB17-20 methodology, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Mozambique and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for global: ease of doing business score?
- Mozambique ranks 139th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 142nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Global: Ease of doing business score (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ease of doing business score is the simple average of the scores for each of the Doing Business topics: starting a business, dealing with construction permits, getting electricity, registering property, getting credit, protecting minority investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies for topics that underwent methodology updates.