Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Global: Ease of doing business score
Global: Ease of doing business score over time
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 54.64 DB17-20 methodology against 54.46 DB17-20 methodology in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.18 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 140th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 142nd of 191 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global: ease of doing business score, Saint Kitts and Nevis or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 54.64 DB17-20 methodology against 54.46 DB17-20 methodology in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in global: ease of doing business score between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 0.18 DB17-20 methodology, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for global: ease of doing business score?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 140th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 142nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Global: Ease of doing business score (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ease of doing business score is the simple average of the scores for each of the Doing Business topics: starting a business, dealing with construction permits, getting electricity, registering property, getting credit, protecting minority investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies for topics that underwent methodology updates.