American Samoa vs Nicaragua: Import unit value index
Import unit value index over time
- American Samoa
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 106.5 2015 = 100 against 103.6 2015 = 100 in American Samoa, a difference of 2.9 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was American Samoa ahead.
American Samoa ranks 198th and Nicaragua ranks 195th of 207 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, American Samoa averaged higher in 2 and Nicaragua in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | American Samoa | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 111.02 2015 = 100 | 86.87 2015 = 100 | 24.15 2015 = 100 | American Samoa |
| 2010s | 115.91 2015 = 100 | 110.09 2015 = 100 | 5.82 2015 = 100 | American Samoa |
| 2020s | 100.6 2015 = 100 | 102.46 2015 = 100 | 1.86 2015 = 100 | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import unit value index, American Samoa or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 106.5 2015 = 100 against 103.6 2015 = 100 in American Samoa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in import unit value index between American Samoa and Nicaragua?
- 2.9 2015 = 100, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for American Samoa and Nicaragua?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do American Samoa and Nicaragua rank globally for import unit value index?
- American Samoa ranks 198th and Nicaragua ranks 195th of 207 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, international and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.