Antigua and Barbuda vs Guatemala: Import unit value index (2015 = 100)
Import unit value index (2015 = 100) over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Guatemala
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 120.3 2015 = 100 against 119.4 2015 = 100 in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 0.9 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 165th and Guatemala ranks 162nd of 208 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 2 and Guatemala in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 89.27 2015 = 100 | 85.24 2015 = 100 | 4.03 2015 = 100 | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2010s | 104.72 2015 = 100 | 108.15 2015 = 100 | 3.43 2015 = 100 | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 116.58 2015 = 100 | 115.47 2015 = 100 | 1.12 2015 = 100 | Antigua and Barbuda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import unit value index, Antigua and Barbuda or Guatemala?
- Guatemala, at 120.3 2015 = 100 against 119.4 2015 = 100 in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2025.
- What is the difference in import unit value index between Antigua and Barbuda and Guatemala?
- 0.9 2015 = 100, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Guatemala?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Guatemala rank globally for import unit value index?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 165th and Guatemala ranks 162nd of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, international and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.