Argentina vs North Korea: Import unit value index (2015 = 100)
Import unit value index (2015 = 100) over time
- Argentina
- North Korea
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 92.3 2015 = 100 against 57.4 2015 = 100 in North Korea, a difference of 34.9 2015 = 100.
That makes Argentina's figure about 1.6 times North Korea's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 205th and North Korea ranks 208th of 208 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and North Korea in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | North Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.5 2015 = 100 | 71.31 2015 = 100 | 15.19 2015 = 100 | Argentina |
| 2010s | 101.83 2015 = 100 | 107.92 2015 = 100 | 6.09 2015 = 100 | North Korea |
| 2020s | 104.18 2015 = 100 | 120.9 2015 = 100 | 16.72 2015 = 100 | North Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import unit value index, Argentina or North Korea?
- Argentina, at 92.3 2015 = 100 against 57.4 2015 = 100 in North Korea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in import unit value index between Argentina and North Korea?
- 34.9 2015 = 100, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and North Korea?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Argentina and North Korea rank globally for import unit value index?
- Argentina ranks 205th and North Korea ranks 208th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, international and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.