Argentina vs Sri Lanka: Import unit value index (2015 = 100)
Import unit value index (2015 = 100) over time
- Argentina
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 96.9 2015 = 100 against 92.3 2015 = 100 in Argentina, a difference of 4.6 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Argentina ranks 205th and Sri Lanka ranks 204th of 208 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 4 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 72.88 2015 = 100 | 63.58 2015 = 100 | 9.3 2015 = 100 | Argentina |
| 1990s | 86.76 2015 = 100 | 83.49 2015 = 100 | 3.28 2015 = 100 | Argentina |
| 2000s | 86.5 2015 = 100 | 85.86 2015 = 100 | 0.64 2015 = 100 | Argentina |
| 2010s | 101.83 2015 = 100 | 106.81 2015 = 100 | 4.98 2015 = 100 | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 104.18 2015 = 100 | 98.43 2015 = 100 | 5.75 2015 = 100 | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import unit value index, Argentina or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 96.9 2015 = 100 against 92.3 2015 = 100 in Argentina as of 2025.
- What is the difference in import unit value index between Argentina and Sri Lanka?
- 4.6 2015 = 100, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Sri Lanka?
- 44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2025.
- How do Argentina and Sri Lanka rank globally for import unit value index?
- Argentina ranks 205th and Sri Lanka ranks 204th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, international and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.