Belarus vs Sri Lanka: Import unit value index (2015 = 100)
Import unit value index (2015 = 100) over time
- Belarus
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 99 2015 = 100 against 96.9 2015 = 100 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 2.1 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Belarus ranks 201st and Sri Lanka ranks 204th of 208 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 79.98 2015 = 100 | 85.86 2015 = 100 | 5.88 2015 = 100 | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 113.65 2015 = 100 | 106.81 2015 = 100 | 6.84 2015 = 100 | Belarus |
| 2020s | 107.35 2015 = 100 | 98.43 2015 = 100 | 8.92 2015 = 100 | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import unit value index, Belarus or Sri Lanka?
- Belarus, at 99 2015 = 100 against 96.9 2015 = 100 in Sri Lanka as of 2025.
- What is the difference in import unit value index between Belarus and Sri Lanka?
- 2.1 2015 = 100, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Sri Lanka?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Belarus and Sri Lanka rank globally for import unit value index?
- Belarus ranks 201st and Sri Lanka ranks 204th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, international and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.