Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Rwanda: Import unit value index (2015 = 100)
Import unit value index (2015 = 100) over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 129.5 2015 = 100 against 129 2015 = 100 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.5 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Rwanda ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 93rd and Rwanda ranks 91st of 208 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83.64 2015 = 100 | 85.05 2015 = 100 | 1.41 2015 = 100 | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 107.99 2015 = 100 | 108.02 2015 = 100 | 0.03 2015 = 100 | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 123.78 2015 = 100 | 123.15 2015 = 100 | 0.6333 2015 = 100 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import unit value index, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 129.5 2015 = 100 against 129 2015 = 100 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2025.
- What is the difference in import unit value index between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Rwanda?
- 0.5 2015 = 100, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Rwanda?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Rwanda rank globally for import unit value index?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 93rd and Rwanda ranks 91st of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, international and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.