British Virgin Islands vs Lebanon: Import unit value index (2015 = 100)
Import unit value index (2015 = 100) over time
- British Virgin Islands
- Lebanon
How they compare
British Virgin Islands currently reports 143.3 2015 = 100 against 142.4 2015 = 100 in Lebanon, a difference of 0.9 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Lebanon ahead.
British Virgin Islands ranks 38th and Lebanon ranks 39th of 208 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, British Virgin Islands averaged higher in 1 and Lebanon in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | British Virgin Islands | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 72.87 2015 = 100 | 80.86 2015 = 100 | 7.99 2015 = 100 | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 104.53 2015 = 100 | 108.44 2015 = 100 | 3.91 2015 = 100 | Lebanon |
| 2020s | 132.62 2015 = 100 | 129.83 2015 = 100 | 2.78 2015 = 100 | British Virgin Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import unit value index, British Virgin Islands or Lebanon?
- British Virgin Islands, at 143.3 2015 = 100 against 142.4 2015 = 100 in Lebanon as of 2025.
- What is the difference in import unit value index between British Virgin Islands and Lebanon?
- 0.9 2015 = 100, with British Virgin Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for British Virgin Islands and Lebanon?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do British Virgin Islands and Lebanon rank globally for import unit value index?
- British Virgin Islands ranks 38th and Lebanon ranks 39th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, international and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.