Central African Republic vs Guam: Import unit value index (2015 = 100)
Import unit value index (2015 = 100) over time
- Central African Republic
- Guam
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 117.2 2015 = 100 against 116.3 2015 = 100 in Guam, a difference of 0.9 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Central African Republic ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 175th and Guam ranks 176th of 208 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 1 and Guam in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Guam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83.15 2015 = 100 | 80.19 2015 = 100 | 2.96 2015 = 100 | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | 98.83 2015 = 100 | 116.74 2015 = 100 | 17.91 2015 = 100 | Guam |
| 2020s | 112.87 2015 = 100 | 116.38 2015 = 100 | 3.52 2015 = 100 | Guam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import unit value index, Central African Republic or Guam?
- Central African Republic, at 117.2 2015 = 100 against 116.3 2015 = 100 in Guam as of 2025.
- What is the difference in import unit value index between Central African Republic and Guam?
- 0.9 2015 = 100, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Guam?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Central African Republic and Guam rank globally for import unit value index?
- Central African Republic ranks 175th and Guam ranks 176th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, international and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.