Comoros vs Hong Kong: Import unit value index (2015 = 100)
Import unit value index (2015 = 100) over time
- Comoros
- Hong Kong
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 138.4 2015 = 100 against 138.1 2015 = 100 in Hong Kong, a difference of 0.3 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Comoros ahead.
Comoros ranks 47th and Hong Kong ranks 50th of 208 countries.
Comoros has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Hong Kong | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 81.8 2015 = 100 | 70.32 2015 = 100 | 11.48 2015 = 100 | Comoros |
| 1990s | 109.11 2015 = 100 | 82.54 2015 = 100 | 26.57 2015 = 100 | Comoros |
| 2000s | 81.28 2015 = 100 | 78 2015 = 100 | 3.28 2015 = 100 | Comoros |
| 2010s | 105.53 2015 = 100 | 99.61 2015 = 100 | 5.92 2015 = 100 | Comoros |
| 2020s | 129.42 2015 = 100 | 120.52 2015 = 100 | 8.9 2015 = 100 | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import unit value index, Comoros or Hong Kong?
- Comoros, at 138.4 2015 = 100 against 138.1 2015 = 100 in Hong Kong as of 2025.
- What is the difference in import unit value index between Comoros and Hong Kong?
- 0.3 2015 = 100, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Hong Kong?
- 46 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2025.
- How do Comoros and Hong Kong rank globally for import unit value index?
- Comoros ranks 47th and Hong Kong ranks 50th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, international and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.