Comoros vs Zimbabwe: Import unit value index
Import unit value index over time
- Comoros
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 137.2 2015 = 100 against 137.1 2015 = 100 in Comoros, a difference of 0.1 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Comoros ranks 48th and Zimbabwe ranks 47th of 207 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 81.9 2015 = 100 | 117.13 2015 = 100 | 35.23 2015 = 100 | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 109.23 2015 = 100 | 82.98 2015 = 100 | 26.25 2015 = 100 | Comoros |
| 2000s | 81.36 2015 = 100 | 72.74 2015 = 100 | 8.62 2015 = 100 | Comoros |
| 2010s | 105.57 2015 = 100 | 106.06 2015 = 100 | 0.49 2015 = 100 | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 126.44 2015 = 100 | 130.88 2015 = 100 | 4.44 2015 = 100 | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import unit value index, Comoros or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 137.2 2015 = 100 against 137.1 2015 = 100 in Comoros as of 2024.
- What is the difference in import unit value index between Comoros and Zimbabwe?
- 0.1 2015 = 100, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Zimbabwe?
- 45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
- How do Comoros and Zimbabwe rank globally for import unit value index?
- Comoros ranks 48th and Zimbabwe ranks 47th of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, international and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.