Congo vs El Salvador: Import unit value index
Import unit value index over time
- Congo
- El Salvador
How they compare
Congo currently reports 128 2015 = 100 against 127.5 2015 = 100 in El Salvador, a difference of 0.5 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 99th and El Salvador ranks 101st of 207 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and El Salvador in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 52.1 2015 = 100 | 57.76 2015 = 100 | 5.66 2015 = 100 | El Salvador |
| 1990s | 76.97 2015 = 100 | 57.28 2015 = 100 | 19.69 2015 = 100 | Congo |
| 2000s | 79.42 2015 = 100 | 78.85 2015 = 100 | 0.57 2015 = 100 | Congo |
| 2010s | 101.59 2015 = 100 | 105.72 2015 = 100 | 4.13 2015 = 100 | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 120.4 2015 = 100 | 121.42 2015 = 100 | 1.02 2015 = 100 | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import unit value index, Congo or El Salvador?
- Congo, at 128 2015 = 100 against 127.5 2015 = 100 in El Salvador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in import unit value index between Congo and El Salvador?
- 0.5 2015 = 100, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and El Salvador?
- 45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
- How do Congo and El Salvador rank globally for import unit value index?
- Congo ranks 99th and El Salvador ranks 101st of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, international and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.