Costa Rica vs Gabon: Import unit value index
Import unit value index over time
- Costa Rica
- Gabon
How they compare
Gabon currently reports 122 2015 = 100 against 121.8 2015 = 100 in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.2 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 155th and Gabon ranks 154th of 207 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Gabon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 78.8 2015 = 100 | 54.24 2015 = 100 | 24.56 2015 = 100 | Costa Rica |
| 1990s | 79.79 2015 = 100 | 73.56 2015 = 100 | 6.23 2015 = 100 | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 88.81 2015 = 100 | 80.51 2015 = 100 | 8.3 2015 = 100 | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 103.44 2015 = 100 | 102.72 2015 = 100 | 0.72 2015 = 100 | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 116.54 2015 = 100 | 116.02 2015 = 100 | 0.52 2015 = 100 | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import unit value index, Costa Rica or Gabon?
- Gabon, at 122 2015 = 100 against 121.8 2015 = 100 in Costa Rica as of 2024.
- What is the difference in import unit value index between Costa Rica and Gabon?
- 0.2 2015 = 100, with Gabon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Gabon?
- 45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
- How do Costa Rica and Gabon rank globally for import unit value index?
- Costa Rica ranks 155th and Gabon ranks 154th of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, international and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.