Curacao vs Nigeria: Import unit value index

Curacao
126.5 2015 = 100
in 2024
Nigeria
126.5 2015 = 100
in 2024
Curacao rank
113th
Nigeria rank
113th

Import unit value index over time

  • Curacao
  • Nigeria
050100150198020022024

How they compare

Curacao currently reports 126.5 2015 = 100 against 126.5 2015 = 100 in Nigeria, a difference of 0 2015 = 100.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Curacao ahead.

Curacao ranks 113th and Nigeria ranks 113th of 207 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Curacao averaged higher in 1 and Nigeria in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Curacao Nigeria Difference Ahead
2010s 114.49 2015 = 100 108.26 2015 = 100 6.23 2015 = 100 Curacao
2020s 117.96 2015 = 100 123.8 2015 = 100 5.84 2015 = 100 Nigeria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher import unit value index, Curacao or Nigeria?
Curacao, at 126.5 2015 = 100 against 126.5 2015 = 100 in Nigeria as of 2024.
What is the difference in import unit value index between Curacao and Nigeria?
0 2015 = 100, with Curacao ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Curacao and Nigeria?
14 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2024.
How do Curacao and Nigeria rank globally for import unit value index?
Curacao ranks 113th and Nigeria ranks 113th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Import unit value index (2015 = 100)
Unit
2015 = 100
Source
Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 6,741 data points, 1980–2024
Last refreshed

Import unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, international and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.