El Salvador vs Ghana: Import unit value index (2015 = 100)
Import unit value index (2015 = 100) over time
- El Salvador
- Ghana
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 127.7 2015 = 100 against 127.3 2015 = 100 in Ghana, a difference of 0.4 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1980 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 102nd and Ghana ranks 104th of 208 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 2 and Ghana in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Ghana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 57.76 2015 = 100 | 36.28 2015 = 100 | 21.48 2015 = 100 | El Salvador |
| 1990s | 57.28 2015 = 100 | 66.17 2015 = 100 | 8.89 2015 = 100 | Ghana |
| 2000s | 78.85 2015 = 100 | 80.69 2015 = 100 | 1.84 2015 = 100 | Ghana |
| 2010s | 105.72 2015 = 100 | 107.84 2015 = 100 | 2.12 2015 = 100 | Ghana |
| 2020s | 122.43 2015 = 100 | 122.02 2015 = 100 | 0.4167 2015 = 100 | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import unit value index, El Salvador or Ghana?
- El Salvador, at 127.7 2015 = 100 against 127.3 2015 = 100 in Ghana as of 2025.
- What is the difference in import unit value index between El Salvador and Ghana?
- 0.4 2015 = 100, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Ghana?
- 46 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2025.
- How do El Salvador and Ghana rank globally for import unit value index?
- El Salvador ranks 102nd and Ghana ranks 104th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, international and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.