Equatorial Guinea vs Moldova: Import unit value index
Import unit value index over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Moldova
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 122.3 2015 = 100 against 121.8 2015 = 100 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.5 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Moldova ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 155th and Moldova ranks 153rd of 207 countries.
Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 73.12 2015 = 100 | 94.66 2015 = 100 | 21.54 2015 = 100 | Moldova |
| 2010s | 104.94 2015 = 100 | 115.24 2015 = 100 | 10.3 2015 = 100 | Moldova |
| 2020s | 115.5 2015 = 100 | 118.4 2015 = 100 | 2.9 2015 = 100 | Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import unit value index, Equatorial Guinea or Moldova?
- Moldova, at 122.3 2015 = 100 against 121.8 2015 = 100 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in import unit value index between Equatorial Guinea and Moldova?
- 0.5 2015 = 100, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Moldova?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Moldova rank globally for import unit value index?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 155th and Moldova ranks 153rd of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, international and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.