Ethiopia vs Guinea-Bissau: Import unit value index (2015 = 100)
Import unit value index (2015 = 100) over time
- Ethiopia
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 124.9 2015 = 100 against 124.6 2015 = 100 in Ethiopia, a difference of 0.3 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Ethiopia ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 133rd and Guinea-Bissau ranks 131st of 208 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 2 and Guinea-Bissau in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 72.16 2015 = 100 | 60.99 2015 = 100 | 11.17 2015 = 100 | Ethiopia |
| 2000s | 87.14 2015 = 100 | 80.35 2015 = 100 | 6.79 2015 = 100 | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 108.43 2015 = 100 | 112.18 2015 = 100 | 3.75 2015 = 100 | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2020s | 120.85 2015 = 100 | 124.78 2015 = 100 | 3.93 2015 = 100 | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import unit value index, Ethiopia or Guinea-Bissau?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 124.9 2015 = 100 against 124.6 2015 = 100 in Ethiopia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in import unit value index between Ethiopia and Guinea-Bissau?
- 0.3 2015 = 100, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Guinea-Bissau?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
- How do Ethiopia and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for import unit value index?
- Ethiopia ranks 133rd and Guinea-Bissau ranks 131st of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, international and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.