Faroe Islands vs Trinidad and Tobago: Import unit value index
Import unit value index over time
- Faroe Islands
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Faroe Islands currently reports 122.5 2015 = 100 against 122.5 2015 = 100 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Faroe Islands ahead.
Faroe Islands ranks 149th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 149th of 207 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Faroe Islands averaged higher in 1 and Trinidad and Tobago in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Faroe Islands | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 85.35 2015 = 100 | 82.16 2015 = 100 | 3.19 2015 = 100 | Faroe Islands |
| 2010s | 106.49 2015 = 100 | 116.82 2015 = 100 | 10.33 2015 = 100 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2020s | 117.9 2015 = 100 | 120.8 2015 = 100 | 2.9 2015 = 100 | Trinidad and Tobago |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import unit value index, Faroe Islands or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Faroe Islands, at 122.5 2015 = 100 against 122.5 2015 = 100 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2024.
- What is the difference in import unit value index between Faroe Islands and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0 2015 = 100, with Faroe Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Faroe Islands and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Faroe Islands and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for import unit value index?
- Faroe Islands ranks 149th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 149th of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, international and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.