Fiji vs Northern Mariana Islands: Import unit value index
Import unit value index over time
- Fiji
- Northern Mariana Islands
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 127.2 2015 = 100 against 127.1 2015 = 100 in Northern Mariana Islands, a difference of 0.1 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Northern Mariana Islands ahead.
Fiji ranks 105th and Northern Mariana Islands ranks 106th of 207 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Fiji averaged higher in 1 and Northern Mariana Islands in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Northern Mariana Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 76.76 2015 = 100 | 83.14 2015 = 100 | 6.38 2015 = 100 | Northern Mariana Islands |
| 2010s | 107.27 2015 = 100 | 106.65 2015 = 100 | 0.62 2015 = 100 | Fiji |
| 2020s | 122.6 2015 = 100 | 127.3 2015 = 100 | 4.7 2015 = 100 | Northern Mariana Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import unit value index, Fiji or Northern Mariana Islands?
- Fiji, at 127.2 2015 = 100 against 127.1 2015 = 100 in Northern Mariana Islands as of 2024.
- What is the difference in import unit value index between Fiji and Northern Mariana Islands?
- 0.1 2015 = 100, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Northern Mariana Islands?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Fiji and Northern Mariana Islands rank globally for import unit value index?
- Fiji ranks 105th and Northern Mariana Islands ranks 106th of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, international and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.