French Polynesia vs New Caledonia: Import unit value index (2015 = 100)
Import unit value index (2015 = 100) over time
- French Polynesia
- New Caledonia
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 124.2 2015 = 100 against 124.1 2015 = 100 in French Polynesia, a difference of 0.1 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was New Caledonia ahead.
French Polynesia ranks 143rd and New Caledonia ranks 141st of 208 countries.
New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | French Polynesia | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 84.13 2015 = 100 | 88.58 2015 = 100 | 4.45 2015 = 100 | New Caledonia |
| 2010s | 106.8 2015 = 100 | 109.24 2015 = 100 | 2.44 2015 = 100 | New Caledonia |
| 2020s | 118.22 2015 = 100 | 121.65 2015 = 100 | 3.43 2015 = 100 | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import unit value index, French Polynesia or New Caledonia?
- New Caledonia, at 124.2 2015 = 100 against 124.1 2015 = 100 in French Polynesia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in import unit value index between French Polynesia and New Caledonia?
- 0.1 2015 = 100, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and New Caledonia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do French Polynesia and New Caledonia rank globally for import unit value index?
- French Polynesia ranks 143rd and New Caledonia ranks 141st of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, international and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.