Georgia vs East Timor: Import unit value index
Import unit value index over time
- Georgia
- East Timor
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 136.3 2015 = 100 against 135.9 2015 = 100 in East Timor, a difference of 0.4 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was East Timor ahead.
Georgia ranks 50th and East Timor ranks 53rd of 207 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and East Timor in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 95.02 2015 = 100 | 101.32 2015 = 100 | 6.3 2015 = 100 | East Timor |
| 2010s | 106.5 2015 = 100 | 109.55 2015 = 100 | 3.05 2015 = 100 | East Timor |
| 2020s | 128.58 2015 = 100 | 126.98 2015 = 100 | 1.6 2015 = 100 | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import unit value index, Georgia or East Timor?
- Georgia, at 136.3 2015 = 100 against 135.9 2015 = 100 in East Timor as of 2024.
- What is the difference in import unit value index between Georgia and East Timor?
- 0.4 2015 = 100, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and East Timor?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and East Timor rank globally for import unit value index?
- Georgia ranks 50th and East Timor ranks 53rd of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, international and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.