Ghana vs Solomon Islands: Import unit value index (2015 = 100)
Import unit value index (2015 = 100) over time
- Ghana
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 127.8 2015 = 100 against 127.3 2015 = 100 in Ghana, a difference of 0.5 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Solomon Islands ahead.
Ghana ranks 104th and Solomon Islands ranks 101st of 208 countries.
Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 33.93 2015 = 100 | 81.41 2015 = 100 | 47.48 2015 = 100 | Solomon Islands |
| 2000s | 80.69 2015 = 100 | 82.98 2015 = 100 | 2.29 2015 = 100 | Solomon Islands |
| 2010s | 107.84 2015 = 100 | 109.64 2015 = 100 | 1.8 2015 = 100 | Solomon Islands |
| 2020s | 122.02 2015 = 100 | 123.47 2015 = 100 | 1.45 2015 = 100 | Solomon Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import unit value index, Ghana or Solomon Islands?
- Solomon Islands, at 127.8 2015 = 100 against 127.3 2015 = 100 in Ghana as of 2025.
- What is the difference in import unit value index between Ghana and Solomon Islands?
- 0.5 2015 = 100, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Solomon Islands?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2025.
- How do Ghana and Solomon Islands rank globally for import unit value index?
- Ghana ranks 104th and Solomon Islands ranks 101st of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, international and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.