Greenland vs Sierra Leone: Import unit value index
Import unit value index over time
- Greenland
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Greenland currently reports 124.7 2015 = 100 against 124.7 2015 = 100 in Sierra Leone, a difference of 0 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Greenland ahead.
Greenland ranks 131st and Sierra Leone ranks 131st of 207 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Greenland averaged higher in 2 and Sierra Leone in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greenland | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 84.36 2015 = 100 | 78.94 2015 = 100 | 5.42 2015 = 100 | Greenland |
| 2010s | 107.48 2015 = 100 | 108.77 2015 = 100 | 1.29 2015 = 100 | Sierra Leone |
| 2020s | 119.22 2015 = 100 | 116.84 2015 = 100 | 2.38 2015 = 100 | Greenland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import unit value index, Greenland or Sierra Leone?
- Greenland, at 124.7 2015 = 100 against 124.7 2015 = 100 in Sierra Leone as of 2024.
- What is the difference in import unit value index between Greenland and Sierra Leone?
- 0 2015 = 100, with Greenland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Sierra Leone?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Greenland and Sierra Leone rank globally for import unit value index?
- Greenland ranks 131st and Sierra Leone ranks 131st of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, international and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.