Guinea-Bissau vs Papua New Guinea: Import unit value index (2015 = 100)
Import unit value index (2015 = 100) over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 125 2015 = 100 against 124.9 2015 = 100 in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.1 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 131st and Papua New Guinea ranks 129th of 208 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 2 and Papua New Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80.35 2015 = 100 | 82.17 2015 = 100 | 1.82 2015 = 100 | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 112.18 2015 = 100 | 108.79 2015 = 100 | 3.39 2015 = 100 | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2020s | 124.78 2015 = 100 | 121.82 2015 = 100 | 2.97 2015 = 100 | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import unit value index, Guinea-Bissau or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 125 2015 = 100 against 124.9 2015 = 100 in Guinea-Bissau as of 2025.
- What is the difference in import unit value index between Guinea-Bissau and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.1 2015 = 100, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Papua New Guinea?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Papua New Guinea rank globally for import unit value index?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 131st and Papua New Guinea ranks 129th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, international and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.