Guinea-Bissau vs Thailand: Import unit value index
Import unit value index over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Thailand
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 130.1 2015 = 100 against 129.3 2015 = 100 in Thailand, a difference of 0.8 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Thailand ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 85th and Thailand ranks 87th of 207 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 3 and Thailand in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 38.05 2015 = 100 | 44.4 2015 = 100 | 6.35 2015 = 100 | Thailand |
| 1990s | 60.09 2015 = 100 | 62.16 2015 = 100 | 2.07 2015 = 100 | Thailand |
| 2000s | 80.43 2015 = 100 | 77.95 2015 = 100 | 2.48 2015 = 100 | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2010s | 112.21 2015 = 100 | 106.9 2015 = 100 | 5.31 2015 = 100 | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2020s | 124.54 2015 = 100 | 120.72 2015 = 100 | 3.82 2015 = 100 | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import unit value index, Guinea-Bissau or Thailand?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 130.1 2015 = 100 against 129.3 2015 = 100 in Thailand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in import unit value index between Guinea-Bissau and Thailand?
- 0.8 2015 = 100, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Thailand?
- 45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Thailand rank globally for import unit value index?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 85th and Thailand ranks 87th of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, international and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.