Hong Kong vs Uganda: Import unit value index (2015 = 100)
Import unit value index (2015 = 100) over time
- Hong Kong
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 138.3 2015 = 100 against 138.1 2015 = 100 in Hong Kong, a difference of 0.2 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1982 it was Hong Kong ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 50th and Uganda ranks 48th of 208 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 69.88 2015 = 100 | 74.28 2015 = 100 | 4.4 2015 = 100 | Uganda |
| 1990s | 82.54 2015 = 100 | 71.56 2015 = 100 | 10.98 2015 = 100 | Hong Kong |
| 2000s | 78 2015 = 100 | 83.49 2015 = 100 | 5.49 2015 = 100 | Uganda |
| 2010s | 99.61 2015 = 100 | 107.9 2015 = 100 | 8.29 2015 = 100 | Uganda |
| 2020s | 120.52 2015 = 100 | 125.43 2015 = 100 | 4.92 2015 = 100 | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import unit value index, Hong Kong or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 138.3 2015 = 100 against 138.1 2015 = 100 in Hong Kong as of 2025.
- What is the difference in import unit value index between Hong Kong and Uganda?
- 0.2 2015 = 100, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Uganda?
- 44 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2025.
- How do Hong Kong and Uganda rank globally for import unit value index?
- Hong Kong ranks 50th and Uganda ranks 48th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, international and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.