Jordan vs Uruguay: Import unit value index (2015 = 100)
Import unit value index (2015 = 100) over time
- Jordan
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 101.4 2015 = 100 against 99 2015 = 100 in Jordan, a difference of 2.4 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Uruguay ahead.
Jordan ranks 201st and Uruguay ranks 199th of 208 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 34.74 2015 = 100 | 69.1 2015 = 100 | 34.36 2015 = 100 | Uruguay |
| 1990s | 33.4 2015 = 100 | 76.59 2015 = 100 | 43.19 2015 = 100 | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 51.7 2015 = 100 | 83.89 2015 = 100 | 32.19 2015 = 100 | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 101.21 2015 = 100 | 106.68 2015 = 100 | 5.47 2015 = 100 | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 98.33 2015 = 100 | 101.97 2015 = 100 | 3.63 2015 = 100 | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import unit value index, Jordan or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 101.4 2015 = 100 against 99 2015 = 100 in Jordan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in import unit value index between Jordan and Uruguay?
- 2.4 2015 = 100, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Uruguay?
- 46 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2025.
- How do Jordan and Uruguay rank globally for import unit value index?
- Jordan ranks 201st and Uruguay ranks 199th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, international and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.