Kiribati vs Sao Tome and Principe: Import unit value index (2015 = 100)
Import unit value index (2015 = 100) over time
- Kiribati
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 124.8 2015 = 100 against 124.5 2015 = 100 in Kiribati, a difference of 0.3 2015 = 100.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.
Kiribati ranks 134th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 132nd of 208 countries.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 78.75 2015 = 100 | 90.57 2015 = 100 | 11.82 2015 = 100 | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2010s | 106.11 2015 = 100 | 111.6 2015 = 100 | 5.49 2015 = 100 | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2020s | 118.83 2015 = 100 | 122.3 2015 = 100 | 3.47 2015 = 100 | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import unit value index, Kiribati or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 124.8 2015 = 100 against 124.5 2015 = 100 in Kiribati as of 2025.
- What is the difference in import unit value index between Kiribati and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0.3 2015 = 100, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Kiribati and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for import unit value index?
- Kiribati ranks 134th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 132nd of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, international and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.