South Korea vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Import unit value index (2015 = 100)
Import unit value index (2015 = 100) over time
- South Korea
- Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 110.3 2015 = 100 against 110.19 2015 = 100 in Sint Maarten (Dutch part), a difference of 0.11 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2013 it was South Korea ahead.
South Korea ranks 186th and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ranks 187th of 208 countries.
South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Korea | Sint Maarten (Dutch part) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 110.16 2015 = 100 | 105.09 2015 = 100 | 5.06 2015 = 100 | South Korea |
| 2020s | 105.8 2015 = 100 | 105 2015 = 100 | 0.7965 2015 = 100 | South Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import unit value index, South Korea or Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
- South Korea, at 110.3 2015 = 100 against 110.19 2015 = 100 in Sint Maarten (Dutch part) as of 2025.
- What is the difference in import unit value index between South Korea and Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
- 0.11 2015 = 100, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2021.
- How do South Korea and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) rank globally for import unit value index?
- South Korea ranks 186th and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ranks 187th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, international and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.