Lithuania vs Malta: Import unit value index (2015 = 100)
Import unit value index (2015 = 100) over time
- Lithuania
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 149 2015 = 100 against 148.2 2015 = 100 in Lithuania, a difference of 0.8 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Malta ahead.
Lithuania ranks 36th and Malta ranks 35th of 208 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 2 and Malta in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80.98 2015 = 100 | 101.99 2015 = 100 | 21.01 2015 = 100 | Malta |
| 2010s | 116.27 2015 = 100 | 116.19 2015 = 100 | 0.08 2015 = 100 | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 138.32 2015 = 100 | 133.6 2015 = 100 | 4.72 2015 = 100 | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import unit value index, Lithuania or Malta?
- Malta, at 149 2015 = 100 against 148.2 2015 = 100 in Lithuania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in import unit value index between Lithuania and Malta?
- 0.8 2015 = 100, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Malta?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Lithuania and Malta rank globally for import unit value index?
- Lithuania ranks 36th and Malta ranks 35th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, international and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.