Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China vs Uzbekistan, Republic of: Import unit value index

Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
126.2 2015 = 100
in 2024
Uzbekistan, Republic of
125.8 2015 = 100
in 2024
Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China rank
117th
Uzbekistan, Republic of rank
119th

Import unit value index over time

  • Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
  • Uzbekistan, Republic of
050100150200020122024

How they compare

Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China currently reports 126.2 2015 = 100 against 125.8 2015 = 100 in Uzbekistan, Republic of, a difference of 0.4 2015 = 100.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China ahead.

Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China ranks 117th and Uzbekistan, Republic of ranks 119th of 207 countries.

Uzbekistan, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China Uzbekistan, Republic of Difference Ahead
2000s 85.62 2015 = 100 86.36 2015 = 100 0.74 2015 = 100 Uzbekistan, Republic of
2010s 104.57 2015 = 100 106.22 2015 = 100 1.65 2015 = 100 Uzbekistan, Republic of
2020s 120.1 2015 = 100 121.9 2015 = 100 1.8 2015 = 100 Uzbekistan, Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher import unit value index, Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China or Uzbekistan, Republic of?
Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China, at 126.2 2015 = 100 against 125.8 2015 = 100 in Uzbekistan, Republic of as of 2024.
What is the difference in import unit value index between Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China and Uzbekistan, Republic of?
0.4 2015 = 100, with Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China and Uzbekistan, Republic of?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China and Uzbekistan, Republic of rank globally for import unit value index?
Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China ranks 117th and Uzbekistan, Republic of ranks 119th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China vs Uzbekistan, Republic of: Import unit value index. Statizoid, drawing on Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/import-unit-value-index-2015-100/macao-sar-china/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/import-unit-value-index-2015-100/macao-sar-china/uzbekistan/">Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China vs Uzbekistan, Republic of: Import unit value index</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Import unit value index (2015 = 100)
Unit
2015 = 100
Source
Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 6,741 data points, 1980–2024
Last refreshed

Import unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, international and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.