Madagascar vs Tanzania: Import unit value index
Import unit value index over time
- Madagascar
- Tanzania
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 123.5 2015 = 100 against 122.9 2015 = 100 in Tanzania, a difference of 0.6 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 38 shared years of data; in 1987 it was Madagascar ahead.
Madagascar ranks 142nd and Tanzania ranks 145th of 207 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Madagascar averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 47.43 2015 = 100 | 48.47 2015 = 100 | 1.03 2015 = 100 | Tanzania |
| 1990s | 60.95 2015 = 100 | 73.22 2015 = 100 | 12.27 2015 = 100 | Tanzania |
| 2000s | 80.04 2015 = 100 | 83.43 2015 = 100 | 3.39 2015 = 100 | Tanzania |
| 2010s | 109.24 2015 = 100 | 108.56 2015 = 100 | 0.68 2015 = 100 | Madagascar |
| 2020s | 119.46 2015 = 100 | 119.4 2015 = 100 | 0.06 2015 = 100 | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import unit value index, Madagascar or Tanzania?
- Madagascar, at 123.5 2015 = 100 against 122.9 2015 = 100 in Tanzania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in import unit value index between Madagascar and Tanzania?
- 0.6 2015 = 100, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Tanzania?
- 38 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 2024.
- How do Madagascar and Tanzania rank globally for import unit value index?
- Madagascar ranks 142nd and Tanzania ranks 145th of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, international and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.