Marshall Islands vs Tonga: Import unit value index
Import unit value index over time
- Marshall Islands
- Tonga
How they compare
Marshall Islands currently reports 119.6 2015 = 100 against 118 2015 = 100 in Tonga, a difference of 1.6 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Marshall Islands ahead.
Marshall Islands ranks 166th and Tonga ranks 169th of 207 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Marshall Islands averaged higher in 2 and Tonga in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Marshall Islands | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 90.14 2015 = 100 | 80.92 2015 = 100 | 9.22 2015 = 100 | Marshall Islands |
| 2010s | 99.71 2015 = 100 | 108.1 2015 = 100 | 8.39 2015 = 100 | Tonga |
| 2020s | 114.34 2015 = 100 | 113.28 2015 = 100 | 1.06 2015 = 100 | Marshall Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import unit value index, Marshall Islands or Tonga?
- Marshall Islands, at 119.6 2015 = 100 against 118 2015 = 100 in Tonga as of 2024.
- What is the difference in import unit value index between Marshall Islands and Tonga?
- 1.6 2015 = 100, with Marshall Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands and Tonga?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Marshall Islands and Tonga rank globally for import unit value index?
- Marshall Islands ranks 166th and Tonga ranks 169th of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, international and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.