Mauritius vs Togo: Import unit value index
Import unit value index over time
- Mauritius
- Togo
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 132.1 2015 = 100 against 131.4 2015 = 100 in Togo, a difference of 0.7 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 67th and Togo ranks 69th of 207 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 4 and Togo in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 78.81 2015 = 100 | 58.98 2015 = 100 | 19.83 2015 = 100 | Mauritius |
| 1990s | 101.86 2015 = 100 | 72.92 2015 = 100 | 28.94 2015 = 100 | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 98.56 2015 = 100 | 134.44 2015 = 100 | 35.88 2015 = 100 | Togo |
| 2010s | 116.8 2015 = 100 | 116.21 2015 = 100 | 0.59 2015 = 100 | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 128.02 2015 = 100 | 127.04 2015 = 100 | 0.98 2015 = 100 | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import unit value index, Mauritius or Togo?
- Mauritius, at 132.1 2015 = 100 against 131.4 2015 = 100 in Togo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in import unit value index between Mauritius and Togo?
- 0.7 2015 = 100, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Togo?
- 45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
- How do Mauritius and Togo rank globally for import unit value index?
- Mauritius ranks 67th and Togo ranks 69th of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, international and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.