Papua New Guinea vs Uzbekistan: Import unit value index
Import unit value index over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 126 2015 = 100 against 125.8 2015 = 100 in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.2 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 118th and Uzbekistan ranks 119th of 207 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.83 2015 = 100 | 86.36 2015 = 100 | 4.53 2015 = 100 | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 108.61 2015 = 100 | 106.22 2015 = 100 | 2.39 2015 = 100 | Papua New Guinea |
| 2020s | 121.08 2015 = 100 | 121.9 2015 = 100 | 0.82 2015 = 100 | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import unit value index, Papua New Guinea or Uzbekistan?
- Papua New Guinea, at 126 2015 = 100 against 125.8 2015 = 100 in Uzbekistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in import unit value index between Papua New Guinea and Uzbekistan?
- 0.2 2015 = 100, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Uzbekistan?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Uzbekistan rank globally for import unit value index?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 118th and Uzbekistan ranks 119th of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, international and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.