Solomon Islands vs Sudan: Import unit value index
Import unit value index over time
- Solomon Islands
- Sudan
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 128.4 2015 = 100 against 128.1 2015 = 100 in Sudan, a difference of 0.3 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Sudan ahead.
Solomon Islands ranks 94th and Sudan ranks 97th of 207 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Solomon Islands averaged higher in 2 and Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Solomon Islands | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 99.04 2015 = 100 | 95.82 2015 = 100 | 3.22 2015 = 100 | Solomon Islands |
| 2010s | 109.72 2015 = 100 | 107.79 2015 = 100 | 1.93 2015 = 100 | Solomon Islands |
| 2020s | 122.62 2015 = 100 | 124.64 2015 = 100 | 2.02 2015 = 100 | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import unit value index, Solomon Islands or Sudan?
- Solomon Islands, at 128.4 2015 = 100 against 128.1 2015 = 100 in Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in import unit value index between Solomon Islands and Sudan?
- 0.3 2015 = 100, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Solomon Islands and Sudan?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Solomon Islands and Sudan rank globally for import unit value index?
- Solomon Islands ranks 94th and Sudan ranks 97th of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, international and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.