Sudan vs Uganda: Import unit value index

Sudan
128.1 2015 = 100
in 2024
Uganda
128.1 2015 = 100
in 2024
Sudan rank
97th
Uganda rank
97th

Import unit value index over time

  • Sudan
  • Uganda
255075100125198220032024

How they compare

Sudan currently reports 128.1 2015 = 100 against 128.1 2015 = 100 in Uganda, a difference of 0 2015 = 100.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Sudan ahead.

Sudan ranks 97th and Uganda ranks 97th of 207 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Sudan averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sudan Uganda Difference Ahead
2000s 95.82 2015 = 100 97.4 2015 = 100 1.58 2015 = 100 Uganda
2010s 107.79 2015 = 100 108 2015 = 100 0.21 2015 = 100 Uganda
2020s 124.64 2015 = 100 123 2015 = 100 1.64 2015 = 100 Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher import unit value index, Sudan or Uganda?
Sudan, at 128.1 2015 = 100 against 128.1 2015 = 100 in Uganda as of 2024.
What is the difference in import unit value index between Sudan and Uganda?
0 2015 = 100, with Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Uganda?
20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
How do Sudan and Uganda rank globally for import unit value index?
Sudan ranks 97th and Uganda ranks 97th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Import unit value index (2015 = 100)
Unit
2015 = 100
Source
Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 6,741 data points, 1980–2024
Last refreshed

Import unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, international and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.