Uganda vs United Arab Emirates: Import unit value index
Import unit value index over time
- Uganda
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
United Arab Emirates currently reports 128.3 2015 = 100 against 128.1 2015 = 100 in Uganda, a difference of 0.2 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.
Uganda ranks 97th and United Arab Emirates ranks 95th of 207 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Uganda | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83.6 2015 = 100 | 81.02 2015 = 100 | 2.58 2015 = 100 | Uganda |
| 2010s | 108 2015 = 100 | 104.71 2015 = 100 | 3.29 2015 = 100 | Uganda |
| 2020s | 123 2015 = 100 | 119.9 2015 = 100 | 3.1 2015 = 100 | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import unit value index, Uganda or United Arab Emirates?
- United Arab Emirates, at 128.3 2015 = 100 against 128.1 2015 = 100 in Uganda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in import unit value index between Uganda and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.2 2015 = 100, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Uganda and United Arab Emirates?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Uganda and United Arab Emirates rank globally for import unit value index?
- Uganda ranks 97th and United Arab Emirates ranks 95th of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Handbook of Statistics and data files., UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import unit value index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import unit value indices come from UNCTAD's trade database. Unit value indices are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD’s estimates using the previous year’s trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classification of the Standard International Trade Classification revision 3 using UNCTAD’s Commodity Price Statistics, international and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates. This indicator is an index series where 2015=100.