American Samoa vs Japan: Import volume index
Import volume index over time
- American Samoa
- Japan
How they compare
American Samoa currently reports 102.2 2015 = 100 against 102.2 2015 = 100 in Japan, a difference of 0 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Japan ahead.
American Samoa ranks 141st and Japan ranks 141st of 204 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, American Samoa averaged higher in 1 and Japan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | American Samoa | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 61.38 2015 = 100 | 88.34 2015 = 100 | 26.96 2015 = 100 | Japan |
| 2010s | 73.94 2015 = 100 | 98.46 2015 = 100 | 24.52 2015 = 100 | Japan |
| 2020s | 107.4 2015 = 100 | 103.38 2015 = 100 | 4.02 2015 = 100 | American Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import volume index, American Samoa or Japan?
- American Samoa, at 102.2 2015 = 100 against 102.2 2015 = 100 in Japan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in import volume index between American Samoa and Japan?
- 0 2015 = 100, with American Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for American Samoa and Japan?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do American Samoa and Japan rank globally for import volume index?
- American Samoa ranks 141st and Japan ranks 141st of 204 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the import value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.