Antigua and Barbuda vs Georgia: Import volume index
Import volume index over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Georgia
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 175.3 2015 = 100 against 168.5 2015 = 100 in Georgia, a difference of 6.8 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 20th and Georgia ranks 22nd of 204 countries.
Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 150.34 2015 = 100 | 60.6 2015 = 100 | 89.74 2015 = 100 | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2010s | 117.55 2015 = 100 | 100.44 2015 = 100 | 17.11 2015 = 100 | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2020s | 152.68 2015 = 100 | 134.86 2015 = 100 | 17.82 2015 = 100 | Antigua and Barbuda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import volume index, Antigua and Barbuda or Georgia?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 175.3 2015 = 100 against 168.5 2015 = 100 in Georgia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in import volume index between Antigua and Barbuda and Georgia?
- 6.8 2015 = 100, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Georgia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Georgia rank globally for import volume index?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 20th and Georgia ranks 22nd of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the import value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.