Antigua and Barbuda vs Serbia: Import volume index
Import volume index over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 185.8 2015 = 100 against 175.3 2015 = 100 in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 10.5 2015 = 100.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Antigua and Barbuda's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 20th and Serbia ranks 18th of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 141.6 2015 = 100 | 106.5 2015 = 100 | 35.1 2015 = 100 | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2010s | 117.55 2015 = 100 | 105.25 2015 = 100 | 12.3 2015 = 100 | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2020s | 152.68 2015 = 100 | 163.34 2015 = 100 | 10.66 2015 = 100 | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import volume index, Antigua and Barbuda or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 185.8 2015 = 100 against 175.3 2015 = 100 in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in import volume index between Antigua and Barbuda and Serbia?
- 10.5 2015 = 100, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Serbia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Serbia rank globally for import volume index?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 20th and Serbia ranks 18th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the import value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.