Aruba vs Ghana: Import volume index

Aruba
91.3 2015 = 100
in 2024
Ghana
90.5 2015 = 100
in 2024
Aruba rank
162nd
Ghana rank
163rd

Import volume index over time

  • Aruba
  • Ghana
0100200300400200520142024

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 91.3 2015 = 100 against 90.5 2015 = 100 in Ghana, a difference of 0.8 2015 = 100.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Aruba ahead.

Aruba ranks 162nd and Ghana ranks 163rd of 204 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 2 and Ghana in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Ghana Difference Ahead
2000s 307.14 2015 = 100 58.9 2015 = 100 248.24 2015 = 100 Aruba
2010s 118.05 2015 = 100 97.47 2015 = 100 20.58 2015 = 100 Aruba
2020s 80.98 2015 = 100 85.66 2015 = 100 4.68 2015 = 100 Ghana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher import volume index, Aruba or Ghana?
Aruba, at 91.3 2015 = 100 against 90.5 2015 = 100 in Ghana as of 2024.
What is the difference in import volume index between Aruba and Ghana?
0.8 2015 = 100, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Ghana?
20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
How do Aruba and Ghana rank globally for import volume index?
Aruba ranks 162nd and Ghana ranks 163rd of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Import volume index (2015 = 100)
Unit
2015 = 100
Source
UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
205 places, 4,078 data points, 2005–2024
Last refreshed

Import volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the import value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.