Belgium vs Sao Tome and Principe: Import volume index
Import volume index over time
- Belgium
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 96.2 2015 = 100 against 95 2015 = 100 in Belgium, a difference of 1.2 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 153rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 152nd of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 2 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 97.1 2015 = 100 | 59.22 2015 = 100 | 37.88 2015 = 100 | Belgium |
| 2010s | 100.11 2015 = 100 | 99.62 2015 = 100 | 0.49 2015 = 100 | Belgium |
| 2020s | 101.4 2015 = 100 | 108.72 2015 = 100 | 7.32 2015 = 100 | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import volume index, Belgium or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 96.2 2015 = 100 against 95 2015 = 100 in Belgium as of 2024.
- What is the difference in import volume index between Belgium and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 1.2 2015 = 100, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for import volume index?
- Belgium ranks 153rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 152nd of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the import value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.