Bermuda vs Zimbabwe: Import volume index
Import volume index over time
- Bermuda
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 123.1 2015 = 100 against 122.3 2015 = 100 in Bermuda, a difference of 0.8 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Bermuda ahead.
Bermuda ranks 88th and Zimbabwe ranks 86th of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bermuda averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bermuda | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 129.02 2015 = 100 | 60.82 2015 = 100 | 68.2 2015 = 100 | Bermuda |
| 2010s | 98.16 2015 = 100 | 100.47 2015 = 100 | 2.31 2015 = 100 | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 103.1 2015 = 100 | 108.14 2015 = 100 | 5.04 2015 = 100 | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import volume index, Bermuda or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 123.1 2015 = 100 against 122.3 2015 = 100 in Bermuda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in import volume index between Bermuda and Zimbabwe?
- 0.8 2015 = 100, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bermuda and Zimbabwe?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Bermuda and Zimbabwe rank globally for import volume index?
- Bermuda ranks 88th and Zimbabwe ranks 86th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the import value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.