Bhutan vs Latvia: Import volume index

Bhutan
108.5 2015 = 100
in 2024
Latvia
110.9 2015 = 100
in 2024
Bhutan rank
121st
Latvia rank
120th

Import volume index over time

  • Bhutan
  • Latvia
406080100120200520142024

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 110.9 2015 = 100 against 108.5 2015 = 100 in Bhutan, a difference of 2.4 2015 = 100.

Across all 20 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.

Bhutan ranks 121st and Latvia ranks 120th of 204 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Latvia Difference Ahead
2000s 46.84 2015 = 100 84.06 2015 = 100 37.22 2015 = 100 Latvia
2010s 85.24 2015 = 100 101.48 2015 = 100 16.24 2015 = 100 Latvia
2020s 98 2015 = 100 121.44 2015 = 100 23.44 2015 = 100 Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher import volume index, Bhutan or Latvia?
Latvia, at 110.9 2015 = 100 against 108.5 2015 = 100 in Bhutan as of 2024.
What is the difference in import volume index between Bhutan and Latvia?
2.4 2015 = 100, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Latvia?
20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
How do Bhutan and Latvia rank globally for import volume index?
Bhutan ranks 121st and Latvia ranks 120th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Import volume index (2015 = 100)
Unit
2015 = 100
Source
UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
205 places, 4,078 data points, 2005–2024
Last refreshed

Import volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the import value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.