Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Iceland: Import volume index
Import volume index over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Iceland
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 138.7 2015 = 100 against 138 2015 = 100 in Iceland, a difference of 0.7 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Iceland ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 56th and Iceland ranks 57th of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Iceland in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 101.66 2015 = 100 | 103.46 2015 = 100 | 1.8 2015 = 100 | Iceland |
| 2010s | 106.05 2015 = 100 | 95.94 2015 = 100 | 10.11 2015 = 100 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2020s | 125.18 2015 = 100 | 125.3 2015 = 100 | 0.12 2015 = 100 | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import volume index, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Iceland?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 138.7 2015 = 100 against 138 2015 = 100 in Iceland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in import volume index between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Iceland?
- 0.7 2015 = 100, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Iceland?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Iceland rank globally for import volume index?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 56th and Iceland ranks 57th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the import value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.