Burkina Faso vs North Macedonia: Import volume index
Import volume index over time
- Burkina Faso
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 148.2 2015 = 100 against 146.6 2015 = 100 in North Macedonia, a difference of 1.6 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was North Macedonia ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 40th and North Macedonia ranks 42nd of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 1 and North Macedonia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.06 2015 = 100 | 74.2 2015 = 100 | 18.14 2015 = 100 | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 104.81 2015 = 100 | 103.6 2015 = 100 | 1.21 2015 = 100 | Burkina Faso |
| 2020s | 127.96 2015 = 100 | 142.62 2015 = 100 | 14.66 2015 = 100 | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import volume index, Burkina Faso or North Macedonia?
- Burkina Faso, at 148.2 2015 = 100 against 146.6 2015 = 100 in North Macedonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in import volume index between Burkina Faso and North Macedonia?
- 1.6 2015 = 100, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and North Macedonia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Burkina Faso and North Macedonia rank globally for import volume index?
- Burkina Faso ranks 40th and North Macedonia ranks 42nd of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the import value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.