Burkina Faso vs Solomon Islands: Import volume index
Import volume index over time
- Burkina Faso
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 149 2015 = 100 against 148.2 2015 = 100 in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.8 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Solomon Islands ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 40th and Solomon Islands ranks 38th of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 1 and Solomon Islands in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.06 2015 = 100 | 63.88 2015 = 100 | 7.82 2015 = 100 | Solomon Islands |
| 2010s | 104.81 2015 = 100 | 114.64 2015 = 100 | 9.83 2015 = 100 | Solomon Islands |
| 2020s | 127.96 2015 = 100 | 127.32 2015 = 100 | 0.64 2015 = 100 | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import volume index, Burkina Faso or Solomon Islands?
- Solomon Islands, at 149 2015 = 100 against 148.2 2015 = 100 in Burkina Faso as of 2024.
- What is the difference in import volume index between Burkina Faso and Solomon Islands?
- 0.8 2015 = 100, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Solomon Islands?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Burkina Faso and Solomon Islands rank globally for import volume index?
- Burkina Faso ranks 40th and Solomon Islands ranks 38th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the import value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.